Sports journalist Jemele Hill has sparked a lively debate with her recent take on the future of two of the WNBA’s brightest stars. During a discussion on emerging talent and the league’s next generation of icons, Hill made waves by declaring that she sees Angel Reese—not Caitlin Clark—as the eventual face of the WNBA.
According to Hill, Reese’s presence, personality, and impact on and off the court position her as a generational figure—comparable to Michael Jordan in terms of influence and legacy. Hill believes Reese’s charisma, marketability, and competitive edge give her the potential to define an era in women’s basketball, captivating both fans and brands alike.
That’s not to say Hill downplayed Caitlin Clark’s future. In fact, she predicted a stellar career for Clark, describing her trajectory more along the lines of NBA legend Steve Nash—a Hall of Famer known for his finesse, leadership, and back-to-back MVP seasons. For Hill, Clark’s game is elite and unquestionably valuable, but perhaps less likely to carry the same cultural weight or star power Reese seems to naturally command.
Hill’s comments quickly ignited debate across social media and sports circles. Some fans agreed, citing Reese’s growing influence and magnetic public persona. Others argued that Clark’s record-breaking performances and sharp shooting ability already place her among the greats, with the potential to become an even more dominant figure as her WNBA career unfolds.
At the heart of the discussion is a broader question about what it means to be “the face” of a league. Is it about stats, accolades, and championships? Or is it about cultural relevance, leadership, and the ability to move the needle across sports and society? For now, both Reese and Clark are on a fast track to greatness—but how their legacies take shape remains one of the most exciting storylines in women’s basketball today.
