Angel Reese is making headlines again—this time off the court—as she voices her frustration with Nike following the brand’s high-profile endorsement deal with fellow WNBA star Caitlin Clark. The deal, reportedly worth $28 million, has stirred mixed reactions among fans, especially after Nike posters featuring Clark appeared prominently in Chicago, Reese’s home turf.
The timing and location of the advertisements struck a nerve with Reese’s supporters, many of whom saw the move as dismissive of her impact both on and off the court. Reese, known for her outspoken nature, took to social media and other platforms to express her discontent, and even hinted at a potential boycott of the iconic sportswear brand.
This bold reaction has ignited a debate across the sports world. While some believe Nike’s deal with Clark is a natural step in recognizing her popularity and talent, others argue the campaign overlooked key figures like Reese, who also brings star power and cultural influence to the league. For Reese’s fans, the situation feels personal, especially given her strong connection to the city of Chicago.
The conversation has quickly evolved from a single contract to a larger discussion about representation, marketing decisions, and equity in women’s sports. Many are now questioning how endorsement opportunities are distributed, and whether enough is being done to uplift diverse voices within the WNBA.
Whether or not a full-fledged boycott gains traction, Angel Reese has once again placed herself at the center of a vital conversation. Her willingness to speak out reflects a growing awareness among athletes of their power beyond the court—and the responsibility brands have when choosing how and where to invest their support.
