One of the most frustrating aspects of modern football, and particularly since the introduction of VAR, is that pundits just don’t seem to know the laws of the game.
Rangers fans often find themselves frustrated by the numerous controversial decisions, which are often exaggerated despite being easily explained. Even manager Philippe Clement was able to reluctantly accept decisions that went against his team.
In Sunday’s Old Firm match at Ibrox, Rangers fans had to endure Michael Stewart continuously disregarding the rules to support his own opinion. However, the BBC pundit has faced criticism from a group of former top-flight officials for his approach.
Michael Stewart receives criticism over Rangers’ penalty call incident.
A notable incident occurred when Alistair Johnston appeared to trip Fabio Silva in the Celtic box, leaving no room for debate. Johnston initially touched the ball but then followed through on Silva, who exaggerated the fall.
Given the referee’s angle and Johnston’s history, it’s understandable that the Portuguese forward was initially booked before the decision was changed. However, Stewart, on BBC Sportscene, insisted on justifying why it wasn’t a penalty, citing Johnston winning the ball.
In contrast, Peter Grant and Neil McCann presented more reasoned opinions.
Stewart later criticized VAR official Nick Walsh, questioning if he missed the initial ball touch, which wasn’t uncommon. The Behind the Whistle podcast highlighted that touching the ball first doesn’t determine a legal challenge; it depends on the nature of the contact.
Former refs Steve Conroy and Dennis Roache, though Celtic fans, reminded Stewart of his job’s requirements.
This incident underlines the need for Stewart to revisit the rules. In the past, interpretations seem to sway when it involves Rangers, like the “biomechanics” argument during a penalty award and the contrasting treatment of Connor Goldson’s handball. Despite this, it’s uncertain if Stewart will reconsider his stance.
GET MORE NEWS HERE