Angel Reese, the Chicago Sky’s rising star, has become a vocal leader in the WNBA’s escalating fight for fair compensation. The league’s recent contract proposal—raising minimum salaries from $66,000 to $250,000 and maximum salaries to $1 million—was rejected by players, who slammed it as a “slap in the face.” The core issue? The proposal ignored a true revenue split, a demand players see as essential to securing their financial future.
Reese, in a raw and powerful statement, revealed the personal toll of the league’s current pay structure. “I’m struggling to pay rent,” she admitted, underscoring that the fight transcends money—it’s about respect for the players who drive the WNBA’s growing popularity. With viewership soaring and revenue climbing, players argue they deserve a fair share of the profits their talent generates.
The WNBA’s current collective bargaining agreement has been criticized for lagging behind the league’s booming market. Stars like Reese, alongside veterans and rookies alike, are united in demanding more than incremental raises. They want a transformative deal that reflects their worth as athletes and cultural icons. The rejection of the league’s offer signals a shift: players are done accepting short-term fixes.
This standoff comes as the WNBA rides a wave of unprecedented attention, fueled by stars like Reese, Caitlin Clark, and A’ja Wilson. Yet, despite sold-out arenas and record TV ratings, many players still rely on overseas contracts to supplement their income. The players’ union is now pushing for a revenue-sharing model akin to the NBA’s, which could redefine the league’s economic landscape.
As negotiations continue, Reese’s candidness has sparked a broader conversation about equity in women’s sports. The message is clear: the WNBA must treat its players like the stars they are, or risk a deeper divide.
About the Author
