The Keep Right On Podcast recently discussed Birmingham City’s eight out-of-contract players, a typical dilemma for clubs during this period. The podcast hosts, Alex Dicken (AD) and Brian Dick (BD), revisited their perspectives following Blues’ relegation to League One.
One player under scrutiny is John Ruddy. AD acknowledged some lapses but highlighted his overall performance, noting improvements under Gary Rowett. BD echoed this sentiment, emphasizing Ruddy’s efforts amidst defensive frailties. However, BD questioned whether Ruddy fits into the club’s future plans, considering his age and style compared to potential managerial changes and the desired possession-based football.
Both hosts expressed appreciation for Ruddy’s leadership but leaned towards parting ways to facilitate the club’s transition to a younger goalkeeper aligned with their evolving football philosophy. They recognized the need for long-term planning amidst uncertainties surrounding Ruddy’s future.
Neil Etheridge:
AD: “I’ve only watched him play three or four times this season. From what I saw in the league games against West Brom and Sheffield Wednesday, I don’t believe he made any mistakes. We know he’s a solid goalkeeper in the Championship, and he would perform well in League One too. However, he’s getting older and isn’t the most adept with his feet. Personally, I think it’s time for Etheridge to move on and conclude his career elsewhere.”
BD: “I doubt Neil Etheridge would want to spend his remaining years as a backup goalkeeper. At 34, he probably desires regular first-team action. It seems more reasonable to let him go. Even if Blues retain Ruddy, it’s crucial to acquire a younger goalkeeper as well. They need a permanent number one, not someone on loan. It’s imperative for Blues to secure a goalkeeper for the long term. There are promising prospects in the lower leagues, so hopefully, their scouting efforts will yield results.”
Marc Roberts:
AD: “He’s accumulated 196 appearances for Blues and has been consistently available. However, his game time has decreased over the past two seasons. Last year, he played 25 league games, and this year, only 14 league matches plus two cup games, while also dealing with three separate calf injuries. Despite one of those injuries, he courageously played in March when Blues lacked center-backs. Roberts is approaching the end of his career and may have one more contract in him, but I’m uncertain if it should be with Blues. He could be a valuable asset to a League One club.
“If the club aims for a more progressive style of play, they’ll need center-backs who align with that approach. To strive for promotion, they require center-backs similar to those at Ipswich, who can excel in League One and transition to the Championship. Retaining Roberts might not be a long-term solution for building a competitive team.”
BD: “For me, consistency in availability is crucial. Roberts has been sidelined three times this season, with two similar instances last season. He was absent for two months early in John Eustace’s tenure. In central defense, you need partnerships that remain reliable.
“This doesn’t diminish Roberts’ qualities suitable for League One or even the Championship. His aerial prowess was missed for much of the season. I’m not critical of Roberts; I believe he’s contributed positively to the club. When his significant contract expired, he accepted a more team-friendly deal to stay, which I commend him for. Unfortunately, injuries are becoming more frequent for him, and I think it’s time for both parties to seek new opportunities.”
Gary Gardner:
AD: “His involvement on the field was minimal last season, and he hasn’t seen much action over the past couple of years due to significant injury setbacks during the 2022/23 season. I recall during our preseason in Spain, he was diligently working on his own away from the team, unable to participate in preseason matches. However, it’s noteworthy that he was available for the majority, if not all, of last season, being part of the squad for over 40 matches across all competitions.”
BD: “Considering the impact of relegation on our perspectives, Gary Gardner serves as a prime example. While he struggled with injuries the season before last, managing only 10 appearances, his presence in 41 Championship squads this season suggests an improvement in his fitness. I’m leaning towards offering him a contract now, especially with the physicality we expect in upcoming matches. Additionally, his loyalty to the club is a factor worth considering, though it’s not the sole criterion for decision-making.”
AD: “Gary Rowett’s praise for Gary Gardner in the latter part of the season speaks volumes about his character and influence within the team. Ahead of the Coventry game, Gardner’s leadership in motivating the players was evident. With the departure of key figures like John Ruddy, maintaining leaders and positive influences in the squad is crucial. While he may not start every game, Gardner could prove valuable in certain matchups and for closing out games. Given the club’s current standing in League One, I support offering Gary Gardner a contract for another year.”
Ivan Sunjic:
BD: “I’ve held the belief for quite some time that it’s time for Sunjic to seek opportunities elsewhere. Despite his efforts, he hasn’t justified the fee paid for him, which is not entirely his fault. While he has contributed positively under Rowett’s management, his style doesn’t align with the possession-based approach we aspire to. I would be surprised if he sees his future at Blues in League One. This decision is clear-cut for me.”
AD: “Sunjic exemplifies a regrettable transfer from the previous regime. While many fans share the sentiment that it’s time for him to move on, his commitment and dedication have never been in question. Even in the final stretch of the season, knowing his time at Blues was likely coming to an end, he continued to give his all. His celebration after scoring against Coventry highlighted his passion for the club, despite his uncertain future.”
GET MORE NEWS HERE
Leave a Reply